Роберт Фишер рушит эго Бориса Спасского в их 6-й партии матча за корону 1972 года - мат неизбежен, атаку белых не остановить

Фишер - Спасский, 1972, битва за корону. партия 6, фг.
Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower, Makogonov Exchange Variation, 9.Bxe7 Qxe7 10.Nxd5 exd5 11.Rc1 Be6; Robert James Fischer (?) vs. Boris Spassky (?) 1-0; Reykjavik ISL: Spassky - Fischer World Championship Match: 1972.07.23; 1. c4!?What happened to "1.e4 - best by test."?! Technically, this isn't Fischer's first outing with the English since he played it against Panno, but Panno no-showed, and he won by forfeit.1... e62. f3 d53. d4 f64. c3 e75. g5 O-O6. e3 h67. h4 b6"Spassky is fond of playing the Tartakower variation of the Orthodox Queen’s Gambit, and he rarely loses with it. It is interesting to watch how it is tackled by Fischer, who has no practical experience with this system." - Euwe, Timman8. cxd5 xd59. xe7 xe710. xd5 exd511. c1 e612. a4 c513. a3 c814. b5"The American grandmaster, as usual, is up to date with the latest theoretical information. In this way S. Furman played against E. Geller in one of the Army tournaments. White provokes the advance of the a-pawn, considering that this pawn can later prove to be vulnerable." - Tal "This is not a novelty, as Furman had already used it successfully against Geller (Moscow, 1970). The idea is to stop the black knight being developed for the moment." - Euwe, Timman14... a6
14... b7!This clever move ended this variation. The following refutation is given by Douglas Griffin.15. dxc5 bxc516. xc5 xc517. xc5 a6!Black's clever idea.18. xa6?18. c6! xc619. xc6 b8 ⩱Black wins the pawn back with activity.18... xa6and White is in big trouble, since he cannot castle.
15. dxc5
"The immediate15. O-Owould be highly inaccurate in view of15... b716. e2 c4 ⩱and Black has no problems." Euwe, Timman
15... bxc516. O-O a7"Geller also played this way in the above-mentioned game. Another possibility was 16...Qb7 with the transfer of the queen to b6. In this way Black rids himself of the pin which (at any rate in this game) caused him no little trouble." - Tal
16... a7! =This move given by Seirawan is best. Now...17. a4 a5 =gives Black equality.
16... b7?!17. a4 ⩲Despite Tal's (and Reshevky's) approbation, 16...Qb7?! is inaccurate because of 17.Ba4! which retains an advantage.
17. e2 d7Naturally, the knight needs to develop, but now the Ra7 and Qe7 are disconnected, so...
17... a518. c3 d719. fc1 e820. b5 ±was the continuation in Furman vs. Geller.
18. d4!An excellent move! Both Nxe6 and Nb3 are positional threats.18... f8?"In all probability, Spassky had underestimated the strength of White's 20th move. In my view, it was worth preferring 18...Nf6. In this case, the capture at e6 promises White little, while in reply to 19.Nb3 Black can modestly continue 19...Nd7, although after 20.Rc3 White's position is the more pleasant." - Tal
18... f6!19. b3 c4It is tough to decide between this and Tal's ...Nd7.20. xe7 xe721. d4 ⩲White is a little better. It's not much, but it's honest work, and White can press for a long, long time.
19. xe6"Of course. The move is also consistent with Fischer’s style, who prefers the bishop over the knight in this type of position." Euwe, Timman19... fxe620. e4!"Only with great qualification can this be called a pawn sacrifice. It is clear that after 20...dxe4 one of the pawns on the e-file (if not both) will be picked off fairly quickly. White wants to liquidate the tension in the center, in order to then occupy himself without hindrance on an attack on the sector of the board that has caught his eye." - Tal
20. g4?Why not this first and THEN e4?20... e721. e4 f6 =The loose bishop on g4 is attacked, and Fischer loses his advantage.
20... d4?"Now the position takes on an all the more technical character and is all the more in keeping with Fischer's standard - the better position without counter-play for the opponent. Perhaps, all chess players love such situations. But Fischer loves them in particular. " - Tal
20... dxe4!?Basically all of the annotators disregard this move, BUT the latest Stockfish considers it best. How can this be? On a human level, it is incredibly difficult to defend all the weak pawns, but the engine's idea is to use the dynamic open lines and access to the dark squares to generate activity and counterplay. In fact, Spassky had succeeded with such tactics